Also, meiner Meinung nachwürden sowohl Spiel als auch forum nicht unter "online content sharing service provider" fallen wie im entsprechenden Entwurf definiert (siehe quotes am. Ende). In fw geht es nicht in erster (nicht mal in zweiter) Linie um die Verbreitung solchen contents. Während das Gesetz für fw irrelevant ist, betrifft es aber viele andere Dinge, weswegen man die petition trotzdem guten Gewissens unterstützen kann
The definition of an online content sharing service under this Directive should target only
online services which play an important role on the online content market by competing
with other online content services, such as online audio and video streaming services, for the
same audiences. The services covered by this Directive are those services, the main or one
of the main purposes of which is to store and enable users to upload and share a large
amount of copyright protected content with the purpose of obtaining profit therefrom, either
directly or indirectly, by organising it and promoting it in order to attract a larger audience,
including by categorising it and using targeted promotion within it. The definition does not
include services which have another main purpose than enabling users to upload and share a
large amount of copyright protected content with the purpose of obtaining profit from this
activity.
The assessment of whether an online content sharing service provider stores and gives
access to a large amount of copyright-protected content needs to be made on a case-by-case
basis and take account of a combination of elements, such as the audience of the service and
the number of files of copyright-protected content uploaded by the users of the services.
Quelle:
https://juliareda.eu/wp-content/uploads ... romise.pdf (Ich würde behaupten die aktuellste Fassung)